First Movement for democracy in Nepal
®
1990 Nepal became a constitutional monarchy
after democratic movement.
®
King Birendra, became constitutional monarch.
®
King Birendra, killed in a mysterious massacre
of the royal family in 2001.
®
On 1 June 2001, Crown Prince Dipendra murdered his father, King Birendra his mother
Queen Aishwarya and several other members of
the royal family. Later he shot himself.
Gyanendra the brother of Birendra
became King.
® In
February 2005, the Gyanendra dismissed the then Prime Minister and dissolved
the popularly elected Parliament.
The Second movement for democracy in Nepal (April 2006)
® All
the major political parties in the parliament formed a Seven Party Alliance
(SPA).
® Nepalese
Communist Party(Maoists) who wanted to overthrow the government through an armed
revolution joined SPA.
® More
than a lakh people who gathered almost every day on the streets of Kathmandu to
demand restoration of democracy.
® The
number of protesters reached between three to five lakhs on 21 April.
Three
demands
(1)
restoration of parliament,
(2)
power to an all-party government
(3)
a new constituent assembly.
Result
® On
24 April 2006, king was forced to accept demand.
® Girija
Prasad Koirala selected as the new Prime Minister of the interim government.
Bolivia’s Water War
® Poor
country in South America (Latin America)
® The
World Bank pressurised the government to give up its control of municipal water
supply.
® The
government sold these rights for the city of Cochabamba to a multi-national company
(MNC).
® People
received monthly water bill of Rs 1000 in a country where average income is
around Rs 5000 a month.
® Movement
launched by people against the privatization of water.
® In
January 2000, a new alliance of labour, human rights and community leaders
organised a successful four-day general strike in the city.
® Next
strike in February, police resorted to brutal repression
® Another
strike followed in April and the government imposed martial law.
® The
power of the people forced the officials of the MNC to flee the city
The contract with the MNC was
cancelled and water supply was restored to the municipality at old rates. This
came to be known as Bolivia’s water war.
Democracy and popular struggles
® The
movement in Nepal was to establish democracy.
® The
struggle in Bolivia involved claims on an elected democratic government
regarding a policy.
® However
in both cases the struggle involved mass mobilisation.
Conclusion:
(1)
Democracy evolves through popular struggles.
(2)
Democratic conflict is resolved through mass mobilisation.
(3)
Spontaneous public participation becomes effective with the help of organised
politics. There can be many agencies of organised politics. These include
political parties, pressure groups and movement groups.
(4)
In Nepal the SPA was not the only organisation behind this mass upsurge. The
protest was joined by the Nepalese Communist Party (Maoist). Many other
organisations like the organization of the indigenous people, teachers, lawyers
and human rights groups extended support to the movement.
(5)
The protest against water privatisation in Bolivia was not led by any political
party. It was led by an organisation called FEDECOR. This organisation
comprised of local professionals, including engineers and environmentalists.
The movement was supported by the Socialist Party. In 2006, this party came to
power in Bolivia.
(6)
Thus in a democracy several different kinds of organisations work behind any
big struggle.
Kittiko-Hachchiko movement (1987) in Karnataka
® Kittiko-Hachchiko
(meaning, pluck and plant)
® In
1984, the Karnataka government set up a company called Karnataka Pulpwood
Limited. About 30,000 hectares of
land was given virtually free to this company for 40
years.
® Much
of this land was used by local farmers as grazing land for their cattle. However
the company began to plant eucalyptus trees on this land, which could be used for
making paper pulp.
® People
started a non-violent protest, where people plucked the eucalyptus plants and
planted saplings of trees that were
useful to the people.
Pressure groups
® Pressure
groups are organisations that attempt to influence government policies.
® Pressure groups do not aim to directly
control or share political power.
® Pressure
groups are formed when people with common occupation, interest, aspirations or
opinions come together in order to achieve a common objective.
Movements
® Examples:
Narmada Bachao Andolan, Movement for Right to Information, Anti-liquor
Movement, Women’s Movement, Environmental Movement
® A
movement attempts to influence politics rather than directly take part in electoral
competition.
Sectional interest groups and public interest groups
(1)
Some groups are sectional because they represent a section of society: workers,
employees, businesspersons, industrialists, followers of a religion, caste
group, etc.
(2)
Some organisations are not about representing the interest of one section of
society. They represent some common or general interest that needs to be
defended. Bolivian organisation FEDECOR is an example of that kind of an
organisation. This second type of groups are called promotional groups or
public interest groups.
How do Pressure groups and movements exert
influence on politics?
(1)
They try to gain public support and sympathy for their goals and their activity
by carrying out information campaigns, organising meetings, file petitions,
etc.
(2)
They often organise protest activity like strikes or disrupting government programmes.
(3)
In some instances the pressure groups are either formed or led by the leaders
of political parties
(4)
Sometimes political parties grow out of movements. For example, when the Assam
movement led by students against the ‘foreigners’ came to an end, it led to the
formation of the Asom Gana Parishad. The roots of parties like the DMK and the
AIADMK in Tamil Nadu can be traced to a long drawn social reform movement
during the 1930 and 1940s.
Note
BAMCEF
(Backward and Minorities Community Employees Federation) is an organisation
largely made up of government employees that campaigns against caste
discrimination.
Land
rights protest: farmers of West Java, Indonesia. On June 2004, about 15,000
landless farmers from West Java, travelled to Jakarta, the capital city. They
came with their families to demand land reform, to insist on the return of
their farms. Demonstrators chanted, “No land, No vote” declaring that they
would boycott Indonesia’s first presidential election if no candidate backed
land reform.
thanks you sir
ReplyDeleteprakhar agarwal
vdn x
thanks sir
ReplyDeletepankhuri vanjani
(X - VQ)
thanks sir
ReplyDeleterajat maloo
vq
Thank you sir
ReplyDeleteSaksham Consul
SBS X
Thank you sir
ReplyDeleteYash Choudhary
SBS X
Thank you sir
ReplyDeleteshresth sankhla
SBS X
Thank you sir
ReplyDeletesaumya saraswat
(X-VR)
thank u sir
ReplyDeletepinky joy
Mobilisation
ReplyDeleteTku sir
ReplyDeleteIt was very useful
I want explanation for mobilation
ReplyDeleteThank u sir
ReplyDeleteThanks
ReplyDeleteThanks sir please continue this .....this is very help ful for students
ReplyDeleteThanks sir please continue this .....this is very help ful for students
ReplyDeleteThnxxx but I am not satisfied with the answer
Delete